Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter
Coronavirus Clobbers Uber, Leading To $1.8 Billion Quarterly Loss (arstechnica.com) 47
At the time, Uber’s rides business was (just barely) profitable. But it was being dragged down by big losses from Uber Eats, where Uber was spending heavily in pursuit of growth. Uber expected the rides business to become more profitable over time, while losses in the delivery business would decline as growth slowed. But then the coronavirus hit, and Uber was forced to throw those projections out the window. In May, Uber laid off 3,700 people in an effort to contain mounting losses. […] Fortunately, Uber is in no danger of running out of money; it has almost $8 billion in cash and short-term investments. It could easily burn cash at this rate for another year.
The money doesn’t really exist anyway. It’s all phantom derivatives
- by Anonyrnous ( 6157814 ) on Friday August 07, 2020 @09:31PM (#60378927)Can someone please explain what Uber’s expenses are? Surely they could host their apps for a couple of million a year. Where is the other $1.798 billion going? Executive bonuses?
- by msauve ( 701917 )Exactly.What were those 3,700 laid off employees doing? Uber is nothing but some code in the cloud. And even that, built on thumbing their nose at laws and playing outside the rules.
Re:Expenses? (Score:5, Informative)
They pay the drivers more than the fares generate.
They pay the drivers more than the fares generate.
Maybe it’s just me but that sounds like a bad business model.
I’m just a simple country boy and don’t know about all this high finance shit, but I once heard that businesses have to do something called “turn a profit”. Any Economic majors here wanna weigh in on that?
Re:Expenses? (Score:4, Informative)
by _merlin ( 160982 ) on Friday August 07, 2020 @11:46PM (#60379153) Homepage JournalThey’re playing a long game – they want to squeeze out all the competitors, then raise fares and reduce driver pay. It’s effectively a form of dumping, which is illegal. They only need to keep fares low while faced with competition for customers, and they only need to keep driver pay acceptable while faced with competition from other employers.
How is that sustainable?
You need a spreadsheet to understand it.
TLDR version: If you have X amount of income per year then you can afford to lose X/n amount of money until you become an unassailable monopoly, at which point you raise your prices and earn X*p per year indefinitely, where ‘p’ is greater than ‘n’. All it takes is financing to get it over the initial hump.
You should be looking at these figures and thinking that now is the time to invest because if Uber did badly then everybody else did worse.
They pay the drivers more than the fares generate.
In other words, Uber should not complain about but rather be happy with the Coronavirus since fewer rides = smaller loss.
Losses don’t matter. Uber bosses will be laughing at the journalists who write this ignorant crap.
- But if that were the full explanation, then their revenue loss would *decline* as number of fares dropped. And yet, here we are. So I don’t think that explains the full story.
It’s worse than that.
Revenue – $10 Billion (3 from Uber, 7 from Uber Eats). They reported a loss of 1.8 Billion, which means they spent the entire 10 billion plus another 1.8 Billion on top of that.
Total spending is $11.8 Billion. –>> IN ONE QUARTER !!
Simple math should tell you they only need to raise prices by 20% to start earning huge profits.
The longer they wait, the more they can eventually increase their prices because nobody else will be able to finance their way into the market.
- Venture capitalists + sunken cost fallacy
Can someone please explain what Uber’s expenses are?
Surely they could host their apps for a couple of million a year. Where is the other $1.798 billion going? Executive bonuses?This is their breakdown
Start with their revenue of $2.241 billion. Now start deducting their costs and expenses…
– Cost of revenue, exclusive of depreciation and amortization = $1.252 billion
– Operations and support = $582 million
– Sales and marketing = $736 million
– Research and development = $584 million
– General and administrative = $565 million
– Depreciation and amortization = $129 million
Total costs and expenses = $3.848 billion$2.241 billion in revenue
– $3.848 billion total costs and expenses
________Rider discounts…fall under their “sales and marketing” category.
Nope.
From Uber’s S-1 IPO filing. Note the part about consumer discounts and promotions
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1543151/000119312519103850/d647752ds1.htm [sec.gov]
Sales and Marketing
We market our offerings to platform users directly through brand advertising and direct marketing. We use broad-based promotional campaigns, such as television ads, including our “Doors Are Always Opening” campaign, to promote opportunities our platform provides. Our direct marketing primarily consists of consumer dis
I’m not going to defend uber, because they’re awful.
But there’s always someone who hasn’t thought through very much and kinda only at the most narrow aspect of the code who assumes it can be done all cheaply.
Here’s some of what’s involved (and third isn’t going to be anything like all of it)
iOS app. Not terribly hard but not trivial.
Android app that works on every awful android phone. This is much harder than you expect.
They need UI and UX people to actually design the thing because few people want a user ibest post ever, thanks… don’t know if this is a blueprint how to be a sociopath or world class CTO but either way it works
Eh? It’s not a blueprint for anything.
It’s a very very rough rundown of what it actually takes to run a business of this sort. A company that books $10 billion in gross revenue is not a trivial operation. There’s a lot of very narrow minded programmers out there who think that coding is really hard (that’s why they’re so good, they do something really hard) therefore everything else is much easier. And they reckon it’s not too hard to write the only bits of they app they’ve thought of, and that’s the hardes
Android app that works on every awful android phone. This is much harder than you expect.
Android only works on ICS and later, and that’s when Google got Android working worth a shit. I don’t think this is as hard as you think it is. The Uber app is ultimately not that complicated, and it uses other people’s components to do the heavy lifting.
- You left out legal fees. Uber is famous for doing stuff whether it is legal or not at the time.
Look at the pie chart at the bottom of this article (it’s for 2Q 2018. Current numbers are probably worse): https://news.crunchbase.com/ne… [crunchbase.com]
They spend $700M on sales and marketing and another $700M combined for R&D and operations and support. I put those two categories together because I’m not sure how much R&D is needed to run servers and logistics for a company this size, but find it hard to believe they’re wasting it on things like self-driving vehicles.
- Cocaine is a hell of a drug.
- by ledow ( 319597 )
They gave me free food, effectively. Gave me a 50% off offer on a shop I use all the time. So they basically paid a guy to bring me food for free, from a takeaway I use all the time, and gave me GBP10 of free food on top of that.
There are promotional offers, obviously, where you try to encourage custom, but they are basically losing money hand over fist on such things, as part of their normal business model.
Uber is cheaper than a mini-cab, and yet the people who drive for Uber are just mini-cab drivers, a
- At least now they have an excuse for losing billions. They don’t care at all. They only exist to burn through peoples cash until self driving cars become a thing.
- Yeah, I think Uber has been busy “clobbering” Uber. COVID is just the latest and greatest of hurdles they have done a bad job of surmounting.
I am surprised UberEats is losing money too. I am in lockdown and working from home. I got my lunches from UberEats every day this week. I have never used them before.
- Did you think your lunches would put them over the top?
On one hand, it’s a mistake to think that everyone is like you. On the other hand, it’s also a mistake to think that no one is like you.
- by ledow ( 319597 )
I used each of their services once.
Once landed at an airport in London at a time of night when it was then made plain that there were no trains, none, that’s it, done, finished, come back in 6 hours. Why the hell are you not running trains while planes are still landing?
Okay, I should have checked – I live in London and it’s only a 20 minute train ride, but come on.
Options were buses, taxi-rank taxis, or Uber. Uber was cheaper by far (which says a lot about their profitability). Haven’t used them since.
T
“Coronavirus Clobbers Uber, Leading To $1.8 Billion Quarterly Loss”
Someday I hope to be rich enough to lose $1.8 Billion.
I would get some uber eats.
I have no desire to sit in a Toyota with a stranger for hours.
I mean, every time I ever ride in an Uber of a Lyft I make it a point to cut the biggest, meanest, most foul-smelling fart in the car right before I get to my destination.
Just wait ’til you see what people do when these cars finally become driverless. They’ll be spitting on the handles and taking huge dumps before getting out.
I’ll want mine to be fully self-washing and disinfecting before I consider getting inside one.
I mean, every time I ever ride in an Uber of a Lyft I make it a point to cut the biggest, meanest, most foul-smelling fart in the car right before I get to my destination.
Just wait ’til you see what people do when these cars finally become driverless. They’ll be spitting on the handles and taking huge dumps before getting out.
I’ll want mine to be fully self-washing and disinfecting before I consider getting inside one.
In this day and age, this is one of the problems I have with these services, and most public transportation for that matter. When I sit in a subway and it smells like piss and sweat, I have to reconsider just fighting traffic with my own car. It’s a far more enjoyable experience, and I don’t have to worry about sitting in a pile of puke or something else. Someone should get a blacklight in these things.
When you add the expense of self-disinfecting, short of blasting the entire cab with UV-C, it probably a
Uber is in no danger of running out of money; it has almost $8 billion in cash and short-term investments. It could easily burn cash at this rate for another year.
That actually sounds like Uber is forked. They’re definitely not within a year of breaking even. Even before COVID, they were blowing 4 billion plus a year, as they always have. That doesn’t just suddenly turn around.
- “Fortunately, Uber is in no danger of running out of money; it has almost $8 billion in cash and short-term investments” This is assuming they will only lose 1.8 billion every quarter. As we head into flu season, no one is going to be taking Ubers.
$1.8 billion quarterly loss? Isn’t that normal? (Score:4, Insightful)
by No Longer an AC ( 4611353 ) on Saturday August 08, 2020 @12:51AM (#60379271) JournalOr does it usually take a whole year for them to lose that much?
- by nagora ( 177841 )
never mind.
It’s not their money, why should they care when the execs are all still getting paid?
That’s the Uber business model. Enough su**ers to put in more new money.
- … getting in a car with unregulated strangers makes perfect sense in normal times
… getting in a car with unregulated strangers makes perfect sense in normal times
I don’t know where you live, or what taxicabs are like there, but here in the USA the strangers driving them are also essentially unregulated, and so are the vehicles. I’ve been in taxicabs where the drivers had an apparent deathwish, and I’ve been in taxicabs where the taxis were clearly essentially unmaintained, and the vehicles made alarming noises during the trip. Uber might not be any better, but it can’t be any worse. The only thing I’ve been cross about while taking an Uber is that the driver wouldn
>”Coronavirus Clobbers Uber, Leading To $1.8 Billion Quarterly Loss”
No, the REACTION to the Coronavirus Clobbers Uber, Leading To $1.8 Billion Quarterly Loss. There is a big difference. The policies, news coverage, individual action/reaction, are far more responsible than the virus, itself.
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
Related Links Top of the: day, week, month.
- 800 commentsStack Exchange Removes Moderator For Preferred Pronouns Policy
- 725 commentsRichard Stallman Resigns From MIT
- 626 commentsTrolls Are Swarming Young Climate Activists Online
- 603 commentsTwitter Flags Trump and White House Tweets About Minneapolis Protests for ‘Glorifying Violence’
- 567 commentsKamala Harris Asks Twitter To Suspend Donald Trump For ‘Civil War’ and Whistleblower Tweets
Slashdot Top Deals
- Get more comments
- 47 of 47 loaded
God made machine language; all the rest is the work of man.
