Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive
Linux Kernel Developers and Commits Dropped in 2019 (phoronix.com) 11
Over its lifetime there’s been 887,925 commits, and around 21,074 different authors: During 2019, the Linux kernel saw 74,754 commits, which is actually the lowest point since 2013. The 74k commits is compares to 80k commits seen in both 2017 and 2018, 77k commits in 2016, and 75k commits in both 2014 and 2015. Besides the commit count being lower, the author count for the year is also lower. 2019 saw around 4,189 different authors to the Linux kernel, which is lower than the 4,362 in 2018 and 4,402 in 2017.
While the commit count is lower for the year, on a line count it’s about average with 3,386,347 lines of new code added and 1,696,620 lines removed…
Intel and Red Hat have remained the top companies contributing to the upstream Linux kernel.
- Then why the hell Intel processors have so shitty power management in linux?
- by Kjella ( 173770 )
Because the Linux money is in the server/workstation/cloud market, where sleep states and battery life means very little. According to StatCounter the Linux desktop web market share was 1.85% and on Steam it’s 0.67%. There’s of course Android too but it runs on ARM, so nobody really works to optimize Linux for x86 laptops except maybe a few from Google making Chromebooks.
Good point! Also, Linux often use generic power management features defined by some kind of standard. Of course, Linux open source code has some specific tweaks to handle specific vendor hardware but in the end, it is lacking a lot of functionalities implemented by vendor binary blobs available under Windows and Apple. Some vendors provide Linux binary blobs for their hardware and I have used them quite a few times (your kernel becomes tainted). A very few provide their full up to date API in order to handl
- by rtb61 ( 674572 )
Too late, big developments in Russia, China and India. So probably yeah, you would see a whole lot less coming out of Russia, China and India as they will inevitably host their own forks, no longer trusting the USA for anything what so ever. So contributions from those sources will drop, then there is the EU, how far off is an EU hosted Linux because they also no longer trust the USA. USA hosted tech is likely to suffer in this environment, especially FOSS as the US kernel will mostly only end up with US co
- by fleeped ( 1945926 ) on Saturday January 04, 2020 @07:50PM (#59587448)They should always only go up. Yes, that sounds sustainable.
- do that.
Return to code productivity.
Work on a CoC does not add the computer code needed for the productive parts of a OS.
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
Related Links Top of the: day, week, month.
- 966 commentsWhy Aren’t People Abandoning Windows For Linux?
- 584 commentsWhy Linux On Desktop ‘Failed’: A Discussion With Mark Shuttleworth
- 569 commentsLinux Performs Poorly In Low RAM / Memory Pressure Situations On The Desktop
- 467 commentsIs The Linux Desktop In Trouble?
- 406 commentsIs It Finally the Year of ‘Linux on the Desktop’ ?
Slashdot Top Deals
- Get more comments
- 11 of 11 loaded
“My sense of purpose is gone! I have no idea who I AM!” “Oh, my God… You’ve.. You’ve turned him into a DEMOCRAT!” — Doonesbury