Fedora 31 Released – Slashdot | xxxFedora 31 Released – Slashdot – xxx
菜单

Fedora 31 Released – Slashdot

九月 30, 2019 - MorningStar

Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 


Forgot your password?
Close

binspamdupenotthebestofftopicslownewsdaystalestupid freshfunnyinsightfulinterestingmaybe offtopicflamebaittrollredundantoverrated insightfulinterestinginformativefunnyunderrated descriptive typodupeerror

Check out Slashdot on LinkedIn & Minds! | Migrate from GitHub to SourceForge quickly and easily with this tool. Check out all of SourceForge’s improvements.

×

118391606 story

Fedora 31 Released - Slashdot Fedora 31 Released - Slashdot

Fedora 31 Released (betanews.com) 33

Posted by msmash from the new-distro-day dept.
Fedora 31 has just rolled out the door. From a report: Is it an exciting release? No, not really. Sure, enthusiasts will find themselves thrilled withe inclusion of the GNOME 3.34 desktop environment (with Qt Wayland by default), Linux 5.3 kernel, and Mesa 9.2, but otherwise, it is fairly boring. You know what? That’s not a bad thing. In 2019, Fedora is simply a mature and stable operating system that only needs to follow an evolutionary path at this time — not revolutionary. It stands alone as the world’s best desktop Linux distribution. “Fedora 31 Workstation provides new tools and features for general users as well as developers with the inclusion of GNOME 3.34. GNOME 3.34 brings significant performance enhancements which will be especially noticeable on lower-powered hardware. Fedora 31 Workstation also expands the default uses of Wayland, including allowing Firefox to run natively on Wayland under GNOME instead of the XWayland backend as with prior releases,” says The Fedora Project.

Fedora 31 Released

Comments Filter:

    • Re:Yuck (Score:4, Informative)

      by brickhouse98 ( 4677765 ) writes: on Thursday October 31, 2019 @12:30PM (#59366516)

      Why is this crap ever upvoted? Don’t like it, fine. Go use KDE, XFCE, etc. etc.

      • Why did Redhat do its level best to bury the clearly superior KDE all those years? Rhetorical question, everybody knows the answer: because Redhat wanted to exert control over the desktop much like the control they exert over corporate servers.

        • Red Hat’s control efforts are really because they can fix thousands of servers from their side, instead of thousands of part time admins doing it on their own, with some doing it wrong.

          • Oh thank you for educating me! So Redhat’s meddling with community projects in the aid of their own corporate profits was always just purely altruistic!!! Truth!!1!!

            • Let’s be honest; you aren’t really the sort to ever learn anything from anyone who actually knows what they are talking about. It’s, to quote Austin Powers, “not your thing, baby.”

        • Rhetorical question, everybody knows the answer: because Redhat wanted to exert control over the desktop much like the control they exert over corporate servers.

          That’s a silly response. Don’t you remember back pre-GNOME2 days, RedHat was KDE by default. It wasn’t until 1998 when RedHat released their technical preview of RedHat Linux with GNOME 2.0 preview had them reconsider their primary toolkit API. RedHat, and many others, we’re attempting to move away from KDE, which is based on Qt, because of Qt’s licensing. It wasn’t until 2000 that Qt licensing was changed, but by that point many of the programmers for RedHat were head deep into Gtk 2. In 2002 RedHat h

          • Don’t you remember back pre-GNOME2 days, RedHat was KDE by default.

            I don’t remember that because it did not happen. Redhat started the Gnome project just after KDE got started, mainly by Suse, and before that Redhat just had complete crap like TWM.

            • You mean like FVWM, IceWM, or WindowMaker. Because I remember those being the options. No one used TWM. Well, except for a few lunatics that is.
              Motif was licensed, that is why CDE did not become the standard desktop. Then KDE was made as an alternative to CDE.
              But because the Qt license which KDE used was crap, people started GNOME using the GTK libraries used in GIMP.
              FWIW I still think Qt sucks as an API even vs GTK, but it does have better cross platform support.

              • I still think Qt sucks as an API even vs GTK

                You obviously have not done anything beyond toy programs with either. GTK sucks beyond belief. It just does. The UI of every program written with GTK sucks two, I give you the file open dialog as proof positive. You can just tell when GTK is sitting underneath some GUI, e.g., defaults are always wrong, dialogs open in the wrong place or even underneath other windows, crashes if you do anything even a bit unusual, etc. etc. And the source, omigod, the source. Just switch to C++ already, C just can’t do GUI i

            • “I don’t remember that because it did not happen. Redhat started the Gnome project just after KDE got started, mainly by Suse, “

              Neither one of those claims is remotely close to being correct. Gnome was started [wikipedia.org] by Miguel de Icaza [wikipedia.org] and Frederico Mena, neither of whom were associated with Red Hat, and KDE was started by Matthias Ettrich [wikipedia.org], a student who was not an associate of SuSE. It’s time for you to accept that you are claiming to posses knowledge on this subject, but actually posses none. You might also want

        • “Why did Redhat do its level best to bury the clearly superior KDE all those years?”

          You mean bury KDE by having both a KDE Spin [fedoraproject.org] available for those who prefer that as the default and having the complete KDE Suite available for easy install on the standard version with a single command (“sudo dnf -y group install “KDE Plasma Workspaces”)

      • Why is included by default in the biggest distros?

        • Why is included by default in the biggest distros?

          Because that’s where a lot of the developers are in the DE circles. KDE ranks in at second place, but past that third place and down, number of active developers pales in comparison. Shoot, XFCE has been working on getting everything GTK 3 ready since 4.12 days (2015). 4.14 was announced in 2016 and wasn’t released until about two months ago this year. There just aren’t enough people actively working on anything else but GNOME and KDE. MATE is coming in at incremental updates about once a year and Cinn

  • “It stands alone as the world’s best desktop Linux distribution.” Citation of polling to show that?

  • by drinkypoo ( 153816 ) writes: <martin.espinoza@gmail.com> on Thursday October 31, 2019 @01:10PM (#59366720) Homepage Journal

    Is it an exciting release? No, not really. Sure, enthusiasts will find themselves thrilled withe inclusion of the GNOME 3.34 desktop environment

    lololol

    It stands alone as the world’s best desktop Linux distribution.

    LOLOLOL

    Who believes this shit?

  • by roc97007 ( 608802 ) writes: on Thursday October 31, 2019 @01:52PM (#59366902) Journal

    At this time, the well known PC operating systems are all mature. To expect revolutionary changes in every release is not at all desirable. In the early days, when you’re on the steep end of the curve, sure, but at some point maturity should be an objective.

    Trying to have each release be something revolutionary is the kind of thinking that gave us Vista. And Windows 8.

    It bears repeating, the OS is not the application. It runs applications.

    • It bears repeating, the OS is not the application. It runs applications.

      This sounds great but is it reality?

      With Linux it seems the only two real world options you have is to compile it yourself (For mortals this is essentially asking the user to go fuck themselves) from source or cross your fingers and hope everything you want is packaged with your favorite distro and not so horribly broken and outdated that it is useless to you.

  • GNOME is the most unusable worthless interface imaginable. Even worse than Microsoft’s metro BS which is quite an achievement.

    • So it is fortunate that you can download several spins [bytemark.co.uk], I shall be trying the Mate desktop as I agree that GNOME3 is frustrating, vital feature lacking and hard to use.

  • by Artem S. Tashkinov ( 764309 ) writes: on Thursday October 31, 2019 @04:29PM (#59367628) Homepage

    Be aware that currently Fedora 31 does not support bitmap fonts (e.g. Terminus) in most graphical apps due to a removal of this feature in Pango 1.44.

    A discussion of this issue is ongoing [redhat.com] with no definitive resolution yet proposed.

    The easiest workaround if you’ve already updated, is to downgrade Pango to its version from Fedora 30 and add to to the list of exclusions in dnf.conf:

    wget your_favourite_mirror/pango-1.43.0-4.fc30.x86_64.rpm
    dnf downgrade pango-1.43.0-4.fc30.x86_64.rpm
    echo exclude=pango >> /etc/dnf/dnf.conf

    It’s a major cock-up and I wonder why Fedora 31 was greenlit in the presence of this bug.

    A pango developer offered users to buy [phoronix.com] hi-dpi monitors not to be affected by this issue. I’ve got no words.

  • Really? I thought spellcheckers were free.

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

Slashdot Top Deals

Try `stty 0′ — it works much better.

Close

Close

Slashdot

Working...


Notice: Undefined variable: canUpdate in /var/www/html/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-autopost-pro/wp-autopost-function.php on line 51